Cargo.toml (1)

84-91: 💤 Low value

ipnet addition not reflected in summary; otherwise dependency changes look correct.

The net feature on tokio ("^1.43") is valid and required for DNS resolution/socket operations in the policy engine. However, line 91 also adds ipnet = "2" (needed for CIDR parsing in the allow/deny policy), which contradicts the summary's claim that no other dependencies were altered.

Note that ipnet is placed under the "Async and Runtime" section though it's a networking/CIDR utility — consider moving it nearer url/networking deps for clarity, but this is purely cosmetic.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@Cargo.toml` around lines 84 - 91, Update the PR summary to explicitly mention
the new ipnet = "2" dependency (used for CIDR parsing in allow/deny policy) in
addition to the tokio feature change; in the Cargo.toml diff, ensure the ipnet
addition is clearly associated with networking/url deps rather than the "Async
and Runtime" block by moving the ipnet = "2" line next to other networking
dependencies (the tokio features block and url dependency) so reviewers can
easily see it's a networking/CIDR utility; keep the existing tokio feature
changes (sync, macros, fs, rt-multi-thread, net) unchanged.

src/alerts/outbound_http_policy.rs (1)

167-169: 💤 Low value

Consider propagating client build errors instead of panicking.

While the ClientBuilder configuration is deterministic and unlikely to fail in practice, using .expect() in production code paths is less defensive than propagating the error. If future changes introduce fallible configuration (e.g., loading certificates), this would need updating.

🛡️ Suggested fix

Add a new error variant and propagate:

+    #[error("failed to build HTTP client: {0}")]
+    ClientBuildFailed(String),

     let client = builder
         .build()
-        .expect("alert target HTTP client can be constructed");
+        .map_err(|e| OutboundPolicyError::ClientBuildFailed(e.to_string()))?;

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@src/alerts/outbound_http_policy.rs` around lines 167 - 169, Replace the
panic-causing .expect("alert target HTTP client can be constructed") on
builder.build() with proper error propagation: add a new error variant (e.g.,
OutboundHttpClientBuildError or ClientBuildError) to the module's error enum,
change the containing function's return type to Result<..., ErrorType>, and
replace builder.build().expect(...) with builder.build().map_err(|e|
ErrorType::OutboundHttpClientBuildError(e.into()))? (or equivalent) so the
client construction failure is returned to callers; update any call sites and
tests to handle the propagated Result accordingly.

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

• Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
• Create a new PR with the fixes